More Wilderness!
Return to Message Board
..From the Oregonian: S en. Ron Wyden has started a debate that should end with more protected wilderness around Mount Hood and the Columbia River Gorge. The Oregon Democrat released a draft plan Thursday to give wilderness protection to another 160,000 acres of forest around Mount Hood, nearly doubling the existing wilderness areas. For now, Wyden's plan is just lines on a map, drawn in pencil, likely to be changed by political give and take. Yet one thing is certain: This state is overdue for more wilderness. It's been 20 years since Congress approved any broad-scale addition to Oregon wilderness. In that time, the state's population has exploded, especially in the counties surrounding Mount Hood. Mount Hood is a different kind of working forest than it was two decades ago. Motor homes, campers, hikers, climbers and skiers, not log trucks, now clog mountain highways. Mount Hood is now one the nation's premier recreation forests, a year-around destination for hundreds of thousands of people. The management of the forest must change with the times. It's clear now that Mount Hood and the Columbia Gorge must be protected from increasing development pressures. Its heavy recreation use must be more carefully managed. More wilderness areas are needed to more widely disperse backpackers, climbers and skiers. It's too soon to pass judgment on the specifics of Wyden's wilderness plan. Wyden and the other members of Oregon's congressional delegation must take a hard look at how new wilderness would affect timber harvest, private lands and recreation activities not allowed in designated wilderness. The timber industry greeted Wyden's plan with the familiar objection that it would "lock up" more public land. Yet it's doubtful the public ever will support logging in most of the affected forests, including the forested cliffs of the gorge and sensitive watersheds that provide drinking water to many communities. It is fair to question whether any new wilderness legislation for Oregon should center only on Mount Hood and the gorge. Conservation groups have made strong arguments for wilderness protections elsewhere in Oregon, such as at Soda Mountain near Ashland and forests along the Elk River. In his speech Thursday on the floor of the Senate, Wyden said he was open to negotiation and willing to change his proposal. His plan will have no chance in this Congress without the support of Republican members of the Oregon delegation, Sen. Gordon Smith and Rep. Greg Walden. Walden, in particular, knows Mount Hood well -- he's lived in Hood River most of his life. It's time for a fresh look at Mount Hood and a thoughtful discussion about wilderness in Oregon. This state is far behind its neighbors in protecting its most significant forests. About 13 percent of California is designated wilderness, and 10 percent of Washington. Yet only 3.6 percent of Oregon is protected wilderness. Wyden has done a public service in starting a conversation about the forests of Mount Hood and the Columbia Gorge. When all is said and done, these forests should be protected for eternity. http://www.oregonlive.com/search/index.ssf?/base/editorial/1080392738239920.xml?oregonian?ede